“42” MOVIE REVIEW

“42” MOVIE REVIEW



Baseball History Comes Alive Now Ranked #2 by Feedspot Among All Internet Baseball History Websites and Blogs!

Guest Submissions from Our Readers Always Welcome!

Click here for details

Scroll Down to Read Today’s Essay

Subscribe to Baseball History Comes Alive for automatic updates. As a Free Bonus, you’ll get instant access to my Special Report: Gary’s Handy Dandy World Series Reference Guide!




Today we welcome back Bill Schaefer with an interesting “review of a review.” Bill analyzes Boston Globe sportswriter Bob Ryan’s “take” of the movie “42,” written in 2013. Bill then adds his own comments as he goes along. Read Bill’s essay, and see if you agree with Bob Ryan and/or Bill Schaefer! -GL

“42” MOVIE REVIEW

Recently Mark Kolier did a very interesting piece on baseball movies — jogging memories ranging from Pride of the Yankees to Field of Dreams to The Natural among many others. But not much was said about “42,” the story of Jackie Robinson breaking the color line in 1947. The same year that saw the first televised World Series game, September 30, between the Yankees and Dodgers at Yankee Stadium. The Bronx Bombers won 5-3. It was the largest World Series crowd to date with 73,365 fans jam-packed together elbow to elbow and fanny to fanny at “The Big Ball Park.” It turned out to be a thrilling seven-game classic.

CHADWICK BOSEMAN as Jackie Robinson 

I saw the movie 11 years ago with a close friend and one of the all-time Brooklyn fanatics. We had some thoughts about the film, which I will convey with italicized parenthesis-enclosed comments, following a few of the points made by Boston Globe sportswriter, Bob Ryan. He provided a brilliant review of the movie on May 12, 2013. Here is his review edited just a bit for this essay:

I just had to see “42.”

The reviews have been generally complimentary. It’s been a surprising box office attraction. And the first personal account I received was full of praise for the basic baseball accuracy and paucity of Hollywood hokum, and this had come from someone who deeply loves baseball and understands it.

On that score, let me say this: Friends can dispassionately agree to disagree.

I say this because I believe “42” as well-intentioned as it is to be just another in an endless line of Hollywood biopics that wind up messing with history and infuriating anyone who enters the theatre with even a smidgen of knowledge about the subject and the world in which he or she operates.

It doesn’t matter if the subject is Emile Zola, Cole Porter, Abraham Lincoln, or, in this case, Jackie Robinson. No matter how good the story, history is never good enough for Hollywood. It must be embellished.

Now, I’m just asking. Did it really happen that in his very first plate appearance, in his very first exhibition game as a new member of the Montreal Royals — coming naturally against the parent Brooklyn Dodgers — that Jackie Robinson (a) drew a four-pitch walk from a pitcher clearly irked at the sight of a black man holding a bat, (b) stole second and advanced to third on a concurrent wild throw to center, and (c) scored by inducing a balk? Never heard that one.

And was he deliberately beaned by Pittsburgh’s Fritz Ostermueller? Uh, no. He was once hit by Ostemueller, but beanings played no role in Robinson’s 10-year major league career. And that leads to another issue.

The Ostermueller family is not pleased with the characterizations of the onetime Red Sox pitcher (1934-40) as a knee-jerk racist. His 65-year-old daughter, Sherill Ostermueller-Duesterhaus, has this to say: “You shouldn’t have to make things up. Truth and fiction get blurred in this picture.  It put a spotlight on my father for the wrong reason.”

And, um, not to nitpick, but the “42” hurler in question, like all pitchers featured in the movie, was righthanded. I never saw Fritz pitch, but every listing I’ve found says he was a southpaw.

Alan Tudyk as Ben Chapman

One thing the movie does right is the sickening behavior of Philadelphia Phillies manager Ben Chapman. It has been thoroughly documented that he did taunt Robinson viciously, and Alan Tudyk succeeds quite nicely in demonstrating Chapman’s blind rage at the very thought of an N-word sullying his precious major league baseball.

But when Chapman unleashed his verbal garbage at Robinson, did he do it while standing 10 feet in front of the dugout while Robinson was at the plate? I mean, really. Have you ever seen a manager operating outside the dugout while the game was in progress?

(The entire scene was ludicrous. Alan Tudyk looked like a Borscht Belt comic delivering his over-the-top stand-up routine. Director-writer Brian Helgeland gives himself away as a less than-astute baseball fan.)                                          

Chapman was one of the more unsavory characters in 20th-century baseball. He was fired during the course of the 1948 season and never worked again.

Robinson had an outstanding rookie season winning the first Rookie of the Year award by batting .297 and accompanying it with a healthy .383 on-base percentage (he would retire with an exemplary .409 lifetime OBP and an .810 OPS. (Of course, in 1947 no one knew what OPS was). He led the league in stolen bases with 29. He also brought an electrifying base-running style that rattled opposing pitchers and managers alike. And he did it all while playing first base, a position he had never played before.

(Jackie had a 112 OPS plus that year, with an outstanding 133 career OPS plus.  He was robbed of four or five prime years because of the color barrier.)

Hollywood! Every point must be exaggerated for it to have any resonance, I guess. Did Dodger captain Pee Wee Reese really put his arm around Robinson before a game while they were standing near first base with absolutely no one else on the field?

Whatever Pee Wee did — and there’s a lot of historical debate on the subject — he did not do it in that manner.

And when I see Jackie Robinson seated in the clubhouse having a conversation with Ralph Branca while wearing his baseball cap on backward, my head is ready to explode. Nobody, but nobody could have remotely conceived of such a thing in 1947. That fashion statement was more than four decades in the future.

But here’s what is good about “42.”

The casting is superb. Chadwick Boseman gets Jackie the person and is entirely believable as a baseball player. This is not Tony Perkins embarrassing himself in Fear Strikes Out.

Harison Ford as Branch Rickey

(But Boseman does not bring the fire of Robinson inside the white lines. Plus, Jackie was slightly pigeon-toed and always brushed his right hand across his right uniform pant leg as he approached the batter’s box. In certain scenes, however, Chadwick looked astoundingly like Jackie when he smiled.)

Nicole Beharie is flat-out beautiful, and she has to be, because Rachel Robinson can stop a room even today as she nears 91. She completes him, as ‘tis said, and they make an endearing couple. Christopher Meloni, of “Law & Order: SVU” fame, has Leo Durocher’s hairline, looks surprisingly like him, and brings “The Lip” to life. And who knew that Han Solo would grow up to be Branch Rickey?

But as far as John C. McGinley’s Red Barber is concerned, I don’t know whom to blame. Red was Southern, not a prissy pseudo-Brit. Barber was the ultimate down-the-middle baseball reporter-as-broadcaster. His heirs should sue for defamation.

The Ballparks are great.

The re-creations of Ebbets Field, the Polo Grounds, Crosley Field (Cincinnati) and Forbes Field (Pittsburgh) are terrific.

That the film exists at all is important. Flawed though it may be, it is one of the most important American stories of the twentieth century and it should be seen by every young person, of any color and background, male or female. It sheds light on a very important subject.

Bill Schaefer

Sources: Boston Globe, Bob Ryan review, movie “42” May 12, 2013; James Montemurro, baseball historian; Wikipedia, 1947 events.

Subscribe to our website, Baseball History Comes Alive with over 1400 fully categorized baseball essays and photo galleries, now surpassing the one million hits mark with 1,152,000 hits and over 950 subscribers: https://wp.me/P7a04E-2he

I'm a baseball historian who also enjoys writing. My forte is identifying ballplayers in old photos, and my special interest is the Dead Ball Era.

11 Comments

  1. James A Montemurro · February 7, 2024 Reply

    Great piece Bill! Very insightful. Thanks for the Source recognition.

  2. Bill Schaefer · February 7, 2024 Reply

    You’re such a great fan. Thanks Monte, glad you sent the Boston Globe review!

    Ironically Robinson also led the league in “Caught Stealing” in ’47.
    But it was his disruptive force on the base paths that made such an impression. He just scared the hell out of the opposition and Giants rooters!

  3. Thomas L Marshall · February 7, 2024 Reply

    A superb contribution from Herr Schaefer ! Yes, this flick was way more factual than most Hollywood baseball-themed flicks. I saw it @ my local theater not long after it’s release. I would like to offer a mention to the late actor Chadwick Boseman, who fantastically portrayed Jackie in “42”. I read that; after watching the initial screening of “42”, Rachel Robinson remarked that Boseman’s performance was “like watching my Jackie coming back to life”. Another interesting note : as we know, “Jackie Robinson Day” has been traditionally held {since 2004} by MLB on April 15. But in the shortened 2020 season {due to COVID}, JR Day was postponed until Aug. 28 of that year. Chadwick Boseman passed away from cancer @ age 43 on Aug. 28, 2020 ! Great article, Bill. “PLAY BALL” !

  4. Bill Schaefer · February 7, 2024 Reply

    Thanks so much, Tom!

    Did not realize Boseman passed away at such a tender age, so sad. Yes, I also read the Rachel Robinson sentiment. And Boseman did capture the Robinson mystique off the field. Just wish the film had been better researched to transform “pretty good” to “great.”

    You are an amazing contributor, Mr. Marshall!

  5. Mark Kolier · February 7, 2024 Reply

    Great piece Bill and thanks for the shout-out! Making a great baseball movie is more difficult than it might look. Making it real is even more difficult. We just did a podcast on the Athletics this week and took our own shots at Mr. Chapman!

  6. Bill Schaefer · February 7, 2024 Reply

    Thanks, Mark!

    And can you imagine Chapman bellowing obscenities at Robinson like that without getting tossed?

  7. Mark Kolier · February 7, 2024 Reply

    That’s exactly what we said on the podcast!

  8. Cary Seidman · February 7, 2024 Reply

    Robinson leads away from “FOIST”…. NEVER did the great Red Barber butcher the language like that actor. terrible job. and this has to be Harrison Ford’s low point as an actor. His Branch Rickey is like a cartoon character, overacted and one-dimensional. Chadwick Bozeman is decent (but who told him you need to wiggle your fingers porior to stealing 2nd baes???)

  9. Bill Schaefer · February 8, 2024 Reply

    You’re right on, Cary.

    The Red Barber portrayal was a travesty, and many agree with you that Ford was way over the top. Harrison has a tendency ham it up a bit at times.

    Thanks for the comment!

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.